Skip to content

fix(TableIcon): Replace TableIcon with RhUiTableIcon#12476

Merged
nicolethoen merged 1 commit into
patternfly:mainfrom
rebeccaalpert:cursor/replace-table-icon-with-rh-ui-table
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

fix(TableIcon): Replace TableIcon with RhUiTableIcon#12476
nicolethoen merged 1 commit into
patternfly:mainfrom
rebeccaalpert:cursor/replace-table-icon-with-rh-ui-table

Conversation

@rebeccaalpert

@rebeccaalpert rebeccaalpert commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of #12401. Breaking into separate PRs so it is easier to review.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@rebeccaalpert, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 7 minutes and 7 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0f91dde3-50a3-4c33-8eda-d884a320a799

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18e94ab and 2511af7.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/Menu.md
  • packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/MenuOptionMultiSelect.tsx
  • packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/MenuOptionSingleSelect.tsx
  • packages/react-core/src/demos/CustomMenus/CustomMenus.md
  • packages/react-integration/demo-app-ts/src/components/demos/MenuDemo/MenuDemo.tsx

Walkthrough

Across five files in the Menu examples, demos, and documentation, TableIcon is replaced with RhUiTableIcon (sourced from the rh-ui-table-icon path in @patternfly/react-icons). The substitution covers imports and icon prop usage in single-select, multi-select, and custom menu contexts.

Changes

Icon substitution across Menu examples and demos

Layer / File(s) Summary
Menu example component icon updates
packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/MenuOptionSingleSelect.tsx, packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/MenuOptionMultiSelect.tsx
Both example components replace the TableIcon import with RhUiTableIcon and update the icon prop on the third menu item (itemId={2}) accordingly.
Documentation and integration demo icon updates
packages/react-core/src/components/Menu/examples/Menu.md, packages/react-core/src/demos/CustomMenus/CustomMenus.md, packages/react-integration/demo-app-ts/src/components/demos/MenuDemo/MenuDemo.tsx
Menu.md swaps the import entry, CustomMenus.md removes the TableIcon import entirely, and MenuDemo.tsx adds the RhUiTableIcon import and updates both single-select and multi-select menu item icons.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested labels

Needs design review

Suggested reviewers

  • phcox
  • thatblindgeye
  • kmcfaul
  • nicolethoen
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title accurately summarizes the main change: replacing TableIcon with RhUiTableIcon across multiple files and examples.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rebeccaalpert rebeccaalpert force-pushed the cursor/replace-table-icon-with-rh-ui-table branch from 18e94ab to 0d8c2c4 Compare June 16, 2026 20:24
@rebeccaalpert rebeccaalpert changed the title fix(TableIcon): Replace with RhUITableIcon fix(TableIcon): Replace TableIcon with RhUiTableIcon Jun 16, 2026
@patternfly-build

patternfly-build commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@nicolethoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

needs rebase

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@rebeccaalpert rebeccaalpert force-pushed the cursor/replace-table-icon-with-rh-ui-table branch from 0d8c2c4 to 2511af7 Compare June 17, 2026 17:58
@nicolethoen nicolethoen merged commit b6c1b00 into patternfly:main Jun 17, 2026
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants