fix(ci): bump AVM check-circuit per-tx timeout 30s -> 60s#24208
Closed
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
fix(ci): bump AVM check-circuit per-tx timeout 30s -> 60s#24208AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit into
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Fixes the nightly/
nextAVM Circuit Inputs Collection and Check workflow (avm-check-circuitjob), which has been failing on every run.Root cause
avm_check_circuit_cmdsinyarn-project/end-to-end/bootstrap.shrunsbb-avm avm_check_circuiton every dumped e2e AVM tx with a per-command budget ofTIMEOUT=30s, fanned out viaparallelizewith--halt now,fail=1.A single tx —
e2e_multiple_blobstx0x242e67c9...— consistently takes 34–35s and hits the 30s timeout (exit code 124). That one timeout makesparallelizeabort the whole job, so the GitHub step exits 124 even though all other ~105 txs pass in 4–11s.This is not a flake: the same tx timed out in both the latest run (35s, run 27860137759) and the prior run (34s, run 27805430170).
e2e_multiple_blobsis deliberately heavy — it deploys the largeAvmTest/AvmGadgetsTestcontracts and emits more than a blob's worth of data, so its AVM circuit is bigger than the others and sits just over the 30s line (worsened by CPU contention during the parallel run).Fix
Raise the per-command budget from
30sto60s— roughly 2× the observed ~35s, with headroom for parallel-load variance — and refresh the now-stale comment that claimed "all of the e2e test txs seem to be relatively small". No behavior change for the passing txs; the slow tx now completes within budget.Created by claudebox · group:
slackbot