Increase compute capacity on UMSA for registered users#329
Closed
hechth wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
|
@hechth we need to discuss the implications of this internally. Given the current state where workflow runs create thousands of jobs in short bursts on UMSA we are already seeing degraded performance. We'll let you know. |
Member
|
During the past weeks the dedicated capacity of umsa was rarely used. Let's leave the limits at current levels and please let us know when you plan large computational jobs -- we can increase the limits temporarily. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Given our increased workloads and extended testing, it would be great if we could have more compute capacity available and more jobs running in parallel for registered users.
If possible, this could also just be enabled for the RCX user group ... not sure how it looks with overall compute capacity etc. :)
Thanks a lot!