use parsedVersion post 6.11 release#12509
Conversation
|
📦 Pushed preview images as 🚢 See on GHCR. Use by referencing with full name as printed above, mind the registry name. |
| <!-- <base.image.version>${revision}</base.image.version> --> | ||
| <!-- This is used by the maintenance CI jobs, no need to adapt during releases. --> | ||
| <app.image.version>${base.image.version}</app.image.version> | ||
| </properties> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I started a Zulip topic about the error we're seeing in this PR: https://dataverse.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/375812-containers/topic/manifest.20for.20gdcc.2Fbase.3A6.2E12-noble-p7.2E2026.2E2-j21.20not.20found/near/607728288
poikilotherm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR is ready to go.
The failing test's source of dismay is expected: we are pushing this change as part of the release process to build exactly the image it is complaining about being missing.
We should document this in the release process: if the error is about this image (mind: with the version N+1), then safely ignore the failed test.
Yes, I'll put it in this pull request: Thanks for merging and for the discussion in the Containerization working group meeting just now! |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Our normal change, required by our Docker-building process, after a release.
Which issue(s) this PR closes: